Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:13:14 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: fast hash processing bottlenecks On 2015-09-16 21:54, Solar Designer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 02:41:10PM -0500, jfoug wrote: >> On 9/16/2015 2:31 PM, Solar Designer wrote: >> >>> A "rules first" mode would help greatly (apply each rule to current >>> word, then advance to next word; right now, we do it the other way >>> around, which works better for probability-optimized rulesets and slow >>> hashes). >> >> I would really like a mode like that (especially the ability to choose >> between depth or breadth first from command line) > > Agreed. magnum? Not unless you at least take a very quick look at prince+rules and tell me what I did wrong. IIRC it goes from (like) 50 Mp/s to 300 Kp/s. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.