Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:37:54 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: fast hash processing bottlenecks On 2015-09-16 21:31, Solar Designer wrote: > A "rules first" mode would help greatly (apply each rule to current > word, then advance to next word; right now, we do it the other way > around, which works better for probability-optimized rulesets and slow > hashes). Our current "prince + rules" implementation does that (it has to) and it's *very* slow - while prince without rules is faster than wordlist mode. Did I implement it in a bad way? First or not, I think the rules engine has some low hanging fruit for you now that you are up to speed ;-) magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.