Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:35:37 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Encoding (was: Re: Judy array) On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:13:15PM +0200, magnum wrote: > There was, is and will be pros and cons no matter how we do it. > > I now changed the performance-threatening "DefaultInternalEncoding" to > be disabled by default. That should be a fair compromise. For non-UTF-16 > formats or ASCII-only use, this is practically the same as -enc:raw. > > Please try that same test on your slow gear, using a commented-out > DefaultInternalEncoding instead of supplying -enc:raw. I think/hope it > will give you the same performance. Somehow it's even faster now, two new runs with same settings: real 1m0.588s user 4m47.656s sys 0m21.994s real 1m0.459s user 4m47.158s sys 0m21.609s Same number of passwords cracked as before. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.