Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:16:56 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Judy array On 2015-09-15 19:33, Solar Designer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:28:18AM -0700, Fred Wang wrote: >> This is *a* test. It is "contrived" only so far as I chose a repeatable, fixed set of files. The data was real, however, and is very representative of the types of files I process. > > I don't know what magnum meant, by I agreed it's "contrived" in the > sense that for practical purposes a person wouldn't be cracking those > same 2M easy passwords out of the 29M over and over, and they won't care > much whether the first time they do it takes them 1 minute or 10 minutes > (so they can as well do it without --fork even, if they're on a low RAM > machine, and only use --fork once they're past the easiest passwords). Something like that, yes - and I was focused on the pot sync aspect. I did not really mean the test is irrelevant or should be ignored. Sorry for the confusion or bad wording! I look forward to your implementation of Judy in JtR (be it PoC or complete) with great interest. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.