Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:07:47 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Judy array On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:58:10PM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote: > With a large list of hashes and a large pot file, you have quite some > time loading hashes plus quite some time comparing against pot file > hashes, even though the log file is showing the "Loaded a total of", the > "Sorting salts, for performance" and "Remaining " lines and so on (until > a "Rule #1:" line, i.e., including the parsing of rules) with a > "0:00:00:00" time stamp. > > We should try to fix that. The 0 timestamp at start of cracking is on purpose. Should we log increasing timestamps first, then reset to 0 at start of cracking anyway? That would be weird. And we can't log negative timestamps leading to 0 at the start of cracking since we don't know how long the loading will take in advance. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.