Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 19:13:40 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Non-iterated SHA-512 OpenCL formats On 2015-09-13 22:49, Solar Designer wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 06:54:07PM +0200, magnum wrote: >> I see we dropped Myrice's SHA-512 OpenCL formats (in favor of Claudio's) >> in Issue #676 because it had bugs and no maintainer. I can easily pull >> them back. > > Oh, I don't recall seeing #676 before. I just checked it out, and I see > that the two of you are working on this already - thank you guys! > > https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/676 > https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/1753 > > myrice - are you still with us? Your involvement would be helpful. > >> I can't see any SHA-256 from Myrice in our history though? > > Maybe there wasn't. I only reliably recall testing myrice's > raw-sha512-opencl and xsha512-opencl during GSoC 2012. Claudio's raw SHA-512 formats are renamed to -ng again, and Myrice's formats are now back. I updated them to latest "standards" (don't build until reset(), latest auto-tune and so on). I'm pretty sure the #676 bug was squashed in the process. I haven't touched the kernels yet, they look like reference code. Probably plenty of low hanging fruit there. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.