Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 23:52:57 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Large stack alignment On 2015-09-08 22:11, magnum wrote: > On 2015-09-08 21:45, magnum wrote: >> All this is exactly what we've seen so far IRL in Jumbo. All problems >> we've had was aligned declarations local to a parallel for. >> >> Also, I do not see *any* problem using gcc-4.9.2 (only OSX tested as of >> yet). I'll dig into their list of changes (but I already googled this so >> much it would be strange if I missed it). >> >> I'll do some more tests on various systems and compilers. Jim, please >> test under Cygwin and, if possible, under MinGW64. Several google hits >> indicate problem is (or was) worse under MinGW64. > > gcc 4.4, 4.5 and 4.6 (bull) shows the same problems and same workaround > (using function). > gcc 4.4.7 (super) shows the same problems and same workaround (using > function). > gcc 4.8.3 (well) shows the same problems and same workarounds (function > or vtype). > gcc 4.9.1 (super) shows the same problems and same workarounds. Oh, and icc 14.0.0 (super) does not have the problem at all. > This indicates the problem was fixed between 4.9.1 and 4.9.2. > > The only thing I find in changes between 4.9.1 and 4.9.2 is > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63530 (in case this is a > variant of the problem). magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.