Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:59:23 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: SHA-1 H() On 2015-09-03 21:40, Solar Designer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:29:37PM +0200, magnum wrote: >> On 2015-09-03 20:40, Solar Designer wrote: >>> I see you've committed this: >>> >>> +#if cpu(DEVICE_INFO) || amd_gcn(DEVICE_INFO) >>> +#define HAVE_ANDNOT 1 >>> +#endif >>> >>> but I think the check for amd_gcn(DEVICE_INFO) is wrong. >> >> We currently never run vectorized on GCN anyway, unless forced by user - >> if format supports it at all. > > That's the SIMD vs. SIMT confusion again. Oh, right :confused:. That macro wouldn't have any effect though, since GCN has USE_BITSELECT. But I have now dropped it for GCN. Actually CPUs also got USE_BITSELECT so any sections for HAVE_ANDNOT are currently unused but I like to keep them there for the future. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.