Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 00:02:56 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: MD5 I() (was: SHA-1 H()) On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:42:05PM +0200, Lukas Odzioba wrote: > 2015-09-03 22:06 GMT+02:00 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>: > > For md5crypt-opencl, we're getting some slowdown - but that kernel is > > weird (as discussed elsewhere, it currently uses global memory in its > > inner loop). We need to optimize it some more, then re-test this change. > > I did not notice a significant slowdown, after a couple of tests it > seems that results are within measurement error and max seems to be > the same 1851k c/s. Is this --test speed on a lower clocked Tahiti? The slowdown I saw was during actual cracking at length 8, something like 3000K+ to 2900K (and further down to 2700K when the card heats up and drops to non-turbo speed, 1050 MHz to 997.5 MHz in this test). > When we reduce memory bottleneck it should work as expected. Yes, I expect so. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.