Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:23:46 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: plaintext truncation On 2015-09-01 09:14, magnum wrote: > On 2015-08-13 20:57, Solar Designer wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:09:06PM +0300, Solar Designer wrote: >>> To implement this, we probably need to introduce a new format flag. >>> Should we call it FMT_TRUNC? And what should it mean - target system's >>> truncation or JtR's truncation at a length below the target system's? >> >> OK, I think it should be FMT_TRUNC and it should mean the target >> system's truncation, which JtR will replicate (like it does now). >> >> When that flag is not set, JtR will no longer truncate (it will skip), >> so the name FMT_TRUNC will make sense (truncate when this flag is set, >> and do not truncate but rather skip when it is not). > > So eg. LM will have FMT_TRUNC whereas our NT format will not. > > I opened an issue for this, #1724 This is now implemented (3701702). The following formats got FMT_TRUNC as of now: DEScrypt, bcrypt, LM, tripcode, nethalflm, netlm, PST, RACF, sapb and VNC. Some more may need it but these should be the most important ones. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.