Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 03:32:47 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: The cmp_all() of cq On 08/22/2015 03:16 AM, Solar Designer wrote: > However, for --test-full it's a matter of us making a decision on > whether we want the tests to be aggressive (and occasionally warn about > non-issues) or not (avoiding any false positive warnings, but also > missing some real issues). We could have the more aggressive tests being reported only at a higher --verbosity=N level, not for default verbosity. But may be then they'll never get tested. So, may be report at the end of the --test-full run that there were problems detected which weren't reported in detail due to --verbosity level? Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.