Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 06:17:18 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: BENCHMARK_LENGTH bugs On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:03:19AM +0800, Kai Zhao wrote: > Could we define slow: whose speed is less than e.g. 1000K c/s ? As per the previous few messages, we shouldn't define slow for the purpose of your current work. Since this was merely correlation and we already know counter-examples, we shouldn't focus on this aspect. We should instead focus on whether the "Many salts" and "Only one salt" benchmarks results are expected to be different or almost the same. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.