Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:55:14 +0300 From: Shinnok <admin@...nnok.com> To: "john-dev@...ts.openwall.com" <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Unix question Jim, I think it's the other way around, passing the script as argument to the interpreter should be more robust than the vice-versa. Shinnok > On 20 Aug 2015, at 18:29, <jfoug@....net> <jfoug@....net> wrote: > > You should probably use the shell method. There will be systems which the she-bang is not right. Also, can you be assured that the scripts will be execute enabled? Using the shell ./script.p[ly] will bypass both of these issues. > > ---- Mathieu Laprise <mathlaprise@...il.com> wrote: >> Is there advantages of using on the shell python ./a.py or perl ./a.pl >> insteal of directly writing ./a.py or ./a.pl . Does one of the method has >> more chance to work if we don't know anything about the user system, except >> that it's a unix one ? >> Thanks guys! >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.