Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:55:14 +0300
From: Shinnok <>
To: "" <>
Subject: Re: Unix question


I think it's the other way around, passing the script as argument to the interpreter should be more robust than the vice-versa.


> On 20 Aug 2015, at 18:29, <> <> wrote:
> You should probably use the shell method.  There will be systems which the she-bang is not right.  Also, can you be assured that the scripts will be execute enabled?  Using the shell ./script.p[ly] will bypass both of these issues.
> ---- Mathieu Laprise <> wrote: 
>> Is there advantages of using on the shell python ./ or perl ./
>> insteal of directly writing ./ or ./ . Does one of the method has
>> more chance to work if we don't know anything about the user system, except
>> that it's a unix one ?
>> Thanks guys!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.