Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:09:23 +0800 From: Kai Zhao <loverszhao@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: FMT_OMP_BAD Hi Alexander, On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Kai Zhao <loverszhao@...il.com> wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > Can we make a conclusion now ? > > 1. To de confirmed: > Ratio: 2.27670 real, 0.22588 virtual Sybase-PROP:Many salts > > 2. Mistake: > Ratio: 2.37082 real, 0.23632 virtual wpapsk, WPA/WPA2 PSK:Raw > > 3. Add FMT_OMP_BAD for dynamic.c > > 4. Lower than 4.0: there are 17 formats > ... > 5. Lower than 7.0: there are 36 formats, and 53 formats including > the formats lower than 4.0 > ... > > The whole file is attached. Other than 1,2, we should make changes > for 3, 4, 5. > There are 4 formats to be confirmed: ripemd-128 and ripemd-160 are in the same file [ripemd_fmt_plug.c], so should we add FAST_FORMATS_OMP check in the ripemd_fmt_plug.c ? We should add the check for ripemd-128, but it will work for ripemd-160 too. Same file: ripemd_fmt_plug.c Ratio: 3.21824 real, 0.32110 virtual ripemd-128, RIPEMD 128:Raw Ratio: 4.02062 real, 0.40184 virtual ripemd-160, RIPEMD 160:Raw Same file: haval_fmt_plug.c Ratio: 3.91475 real, 0.39122 virtual HAVAL-256-3:Raw Ratio: 4.38736 real, 0.43815 virtual HAVAL-128-4:Raw Thanks, Kai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.