Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:06:54 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: BENCHMARK_LENGTH bugs On 08/17/2015 05:22 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > The "cq" format, presumably like many others, wrongly set > BENCHMARK_LENGTH to -1, thereby inhibiting the Many salts vs. Only one > salt benchmarks. Yet it's a fast, salted format, for which separate > benchmarks are needed. The attached patch corrects this. If we fix that for several formats, can/should relbench somehow be changed to compare against "Raw:" speed instead of "Many salts:" speed, and vice versa? May be depending on a new option? Otherwise, we'll have several formats where we can't compare speeds... Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.