[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:06:54 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: BENCHMARK_LENGTH bugs
On 08/17/2015 05:22 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> The "cq" format, presumably like many others, wrongly set
> BENCHMARK_LENGTH to -1, thereby inhibiting the Many salts vs. Only one
> salt benchmarks. Yet it's a fast, salted format, for which separate
> benchmarks are needed. The attached patch corrects this.
If we fix that for several formats, can/should relbench somehow be
changed to compare against "Raw:" speed instead of "Many salts:" speed,
and vice versa? May be depending on a new option?
Otherwise, we'll have several formats where we can't compare speeds...
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
