[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4cc014dde153e4b48af0152fec94630@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 19:58:32 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: relbench over/underflow when calculating geometric
mean
On 2015-08-16 17:44, Solar Designer wrote:
> The attached patch allows relbench to calculate the geometric mean even
> when there's a large number of significantly different benchmark
> results. Without this patch, I was getting "inf" for $mr and (luckily)
> a crash on log() on line 266 when comparing OpenMP benchmarks for all of
> jumbo's formats on super for 1 vs. 15 threads. This is currently 403
> total benchmarks and each may be sped up by ~15x (ideally), resulting in
> the naive implementation's intermediate value exceeding the maximum
> value for "double". (And comparing these benchmarks the other way, we'd
> similarly have an underflow.)
>
> I think we should commit this into jumbo for now, even though the code
> comes from core. There are by far not enough formats in core to trigger
> the problem in there.
Committed.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
