Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:36:16 -0500 From: "jfoug@....net" <jfoug@....net> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: phpass on CPU, aka dynamic_17 On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:13:15 -0500, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > magnum, Jim, Lei - > > Maybe we should simply (re-)create a separate phpass format, not > building upon the dynamic formats framework? IIRC, we had one before. I have known about this issue a while, ever since the choice was made to consider all of dynamic to be non-OMP scalible. The problem with dynamic is that all format SHARE the same code, and since each thread can be at any point within running script for a range of values, then each of the sub functions within dyna also has to be supportive of OMP. So it is pretty much an all or nothing. > Maybe we should simply (re-)create a separate phpass format This is probably the correct way to proceed, and make sure that format can also prepare/split any $dynamic_17$ back into it's native hash type.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.