Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:13:59 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: PHC: makwa On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:48:32PM +0200, Lukas Odzioba wrote: > 2015-08-13 21:42 GMT+02:00 Agnieszka Bielec <bielecagnieszka8@...il.com>: > > I implemented basic version of makwa on CPU (although this is a messy > > version so far) > > and have questions > > PHS calls makwa_hash with pre_hash=1, should I also support pre_hash=0 > > and support both sha256 and 512 ? in PHS is makwa_init() with > > hard-coded parameters, support also another parameters? > > To make it complete I guess we should support all cases, solar please > correct me if I am wrong. > The question is whether it is feasible to make 2 versions for each sha > function or to "multiplex" them in one format selected by hash > encoding. Personally I would go or the latter. Yes, it should be one format. I think Makwa's use of SHA-256 or -512 isn't performance-critical, so it shouldn't significantly affect benchmarks. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.