Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 07:05:37 -0400 From: Mathieu Laprise <mathlaprise@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: *2john conversion support On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Shinnok <admin@...nnok.com> wrote: > > Does any of you incline towards using binaries done by Rich for > inclusion in > > the redistributable? If they're self contained enough and working well > that > > is, Rich? > I can get python into a standalone executable pretty well. Sometimes > ruby too, I've not made a perl (exe) binary in awhile, I assume it can > be done still. I love the *2john's that just compile into a native > binary best as I'm sure we all would.In the meantime I'm willing to > document my processes and to contribute redistributables. Hey Rich, did you make some progress on that ? Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.