Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 16:24:22 +0200 From: Agnieszka Bielec <bielecagnieszka8@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: PHC: Lyra2 vs yescrypt benchmarks 2 2015-07-26 16:14 GMT+02:00 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 04:07:59PM +0200, Agnieszka Bielec wrote: >> 2015-07-26 15:40 GMT+02:00 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>: >> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 03:15:43PM +0200, Agnieszka Bielec wrote: >> >> the opposite, seems that Lyra2 is faster with different passwords, >> >> when I was testing Lyra I forgot to upload bench.c to server, >> >> and yescrypt > > Oh, so you need to re-do all of these GPU benchmarks with your > randomizing bench.c? on super. I had proper bench.c when testing on 960m and now also have proper bench.c however still I see the difference in this case none@...e ~/Desktop/rrr/run $ ./john --test --format=lyra2-opencl --v=4 Benchmarking: Lyra2-opencl [Lyra2 OpenCL (inefficient, development use only)]... Device 0: GeForce GTX 960M Options used: -I ./kernels -cl-mad-enable -cl-nv-verbose -D__GPU__ -DDEVICE_INFO=131090 -DDEV_VER_MAJOR=352 -DDEV_VER_MINOR=21 -D_OPENCL_COMPILER -DBINARY_SIZE=256 -DSALT_SIZE=64 memory per hash : 1.50 MB Calculating best global worksize (GWS); max. 1s single kernel invocation. gws: 256 491 c/s 491 rounds/s 521.035ms per crypt_all()! Local worksize (LWS) 64, global worksize (GWS) 256 DONE Speed for cost 1 (t) of 1, cost 2 (m) of 64, cost 3 (c) of 256, cost 4 (p) of 1 Raw: 506 c/s real, 506 c/s virtual
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.