Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 18:37:33 +0200 From: Agnieszka Bielec <bielecagnieszka8@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: PHC: my yescrypt and lyra2 benchmarks 2015-07-24 18:22 GMT+02:00 Agnieszka Bielec <bielecagnieszka8@...il.com>: > 2015-07-24 18:03 GMT+02:00 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>: >> Agnieszka, >> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:49:14AM +0200, Agnieszka Bielec wrote: >>> yescrypt >>> >>> well - 4688 >>> GeForce GTX 960M - 206 >>> AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series - 319 >>> GeForce GTX TITAN - 326 >> >> BTW, your GPU speeds for yescrypt are significantly worse than some of >> those reported for BSTY cryptocoin, which is a (slightly older revision >> of) yescrypt at 2 MB (with r=8). Yours are at 1.5 MB. This indicates >> that you can still improve some(?) of these speeds significantly. >> >> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775289.msg11286161#msg11286161 >> >> "A gtx980 gets with sgminer around 1.5kH/s >> A gtx780ti gets around 1.1kh/s with ccminer (but only 400h/s with sgminer) >> I get around 860hash/s with both ccminer and sgminer with 750ti" >> >> Our GTX TITAN should be comparable to "gtx780ti": >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_700_series > > will be faster after remove 'optimization' which makes speed worse > (but should be better speed) and I can move some whole arrays to > __private for these default costs so far I'm getting (for r=6) (after I removed copying and added vectors to pwxform) [a@...er run]$ ./john --test --format=yescrypt-opencl --dev=5 Benchmarking: yescrypt-opencl [Salsa20/8 OpenCL (inefficient, development use only)]... Device 5: GeForce GTX TITAN memory per hash : 1.51 MB DONE Speed for cost 1 (N) of 2048, cost 2 (r) of 6, cost 3 (p) of 1, cost 4 (t) of 0, cost 5 (g) of 0 Raw: 1003 c/s real, 1008 c/s virtual
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.