Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:18:51 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Formats using non-SIMD SHA2 implementations On 2015-07-19 11:35, Lei Zhang wrote: > >> On Jul 19, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@...il.com> wrote: >> >> I have no clear idea which formats rely on SHA2 just from their names, except for a few apparent ones (e.g. rawSHA256_fmt_plug.c). Could you give me some hints about that? > > I used this command to find formats that use OpenSSL's SHA2 functions but not JtR's SIMD implementation: > > $ grep -E 'SHA256_Update|SHA512_Update' *.c -l | xargs grep SIMD -L I tried a different grep and ended up with mostly the same list (sha0 is just a false positive of course). $ git grep -lE "ALGORITHM_NAME.*SHA[- ]?"|grep -vE "opencl|cuda"|xargs grep -L SIMD 7z_fmt_plug.c clipperz_srp_fmt_plug.c dragonfly3_fmt_plug.c dragonfly4_fmt_plug.c episerver_fmt_plug.c keepass_fmt_plug.c pdf_fmt_plug.c rawSHA0_fmt_plug.c The dragonfly formats are not very interesting. I guess the 7z format would be appreciated but it's tricky with different length candidates in a batch. I'm not sure about the others. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.