[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 17:44:28 +0800
From: Kai Zhao <loverszhao@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: poor man's fuzzer
Hi Alexander,
> (ulimit -v 2097152; time ~/j/fuzz.pl &> fuzz.log)
I execute as you did, why the fuzz time are different?
Some takes little time, some takes much time.
$ ulimit -v 2097152; time ./fuzz_solar.pl &> fuzz.log
real 0m7.820s
user 0m1.257s
sys 0m1.567s
real 0m5.781s
user 0m0.761s
sys 0m1.560s
real 0m8.124s
user 0m0.998s
sys 0m1.937s
real 0m16.276s
user 0m10.148s
sys 0m2.279s
real 0m6.846s
user 0m1.135s
sys 0m1.727s
real 1m33.440s
user 1m12.453s
sys 0m10.338s
This leads to different results. Some have fuzz-err.log while some did not.
Some fuzz-err.log have serval hashes while some have few.
Why the results are different ?
Thanks,
Kai
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
