Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 11:26:28 +0300
From: Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: Session names somename.[0-9]+ shouldn't be allowed

On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:39:02PM +0300, Alexander Cherepanov wrote:
> On 2015-05-06 18:58, Solar Designer wrote:
> >On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:38:21AM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> >>IMHO, restricting the use of session names somename.[0-9]+ that might
> >>would be the best way to avoid trouble with --fork.
> >
> >OK, done:
> >
> >"Disallow session names with dots since these clash with those produced by
> >--fork.  Suggested by Frank Dittrich."
> Ugh, isn't it an overkill?
> IMHO it's better to leave everything as it was before than trying to fix 
> a quite exotic problem breaking several useful and convenient (even if 
> unintended) features.

"Relaxed the recently added invalid session name check to only disallow
all-digit suffixes, since these are the ones that may clash with --fork'ed
child session names";r2=1.41

The revised check is thus:;r2=1.41


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.