Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 00:13:36 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Agnieszka's weekly report #4 On 2015-05-25 23:43, Solar Designer wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:57:49PM +0200, Agnieszka Bielec wrote: >> Benchmarking: parallel-opencl, parallel SHA-512 [ ]... DONE >> Speed for cost 1 (N) of 0 >> Many salts: 45936 c/s real, 4915K c/s virtual >> Only one salt: 46369 c/s real, 4915K c/s virtual > > "parallel SHA-512 [ ]" and "Speed for cost 1 (N)" look weird. > > magnum, what's jumbo's current convention on format names (not labels) > and on algorithm names? What should be reported in this case? I think you could capitalize format_label to "Parallel-opencl", leave format_name blank (as long as it's the same as the label bar the -opencl suffix) and use an algorithm_name of "SHA-512 OpenCL". magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.