Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 02:33:42 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [john dev] [PHC support] parallel Agnieszka, On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 01:25:22AM +0200, Agnieszka Bielec wrote: > I've implemented the basic version of parallel (PHS) (SHA-512). Great. > parallel.cpp contains two functions: PHS and parallelKdf. > should I implement also parallelKdf ? No. > or maybe also based on another sha-x ? No, for now please keep it SHA-512 only. > I created a new topic, the old one will be about pomelo only Yes, I was going to suggest this. Thank you. I think instead of "[john dev] [PHC support] parallel", it should have been simply "Parallel" or "[PHC] Parallel". Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.