Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 18:58:28 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Session names somename.[0-9]+ shouldn't be allowed On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:38:21AM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote: > IMHO, restricting the use of session names somename.[0-9]+ that might > would be the best way to avoid trouble with --fork. OK, done: "Disallow session names with dots since these clash with those produced by --fork. Suggested by Frank Dittrich." http://cvsweb.openwall.com/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/Owl/packages/john/john/src/options.c.diff?r1=1.39;r2=1.40 > I think such session names should be invalid for --session=, and > --restore= should not allow resuming if the .rec file contains a -fork= > line, but no --session= line matching the session name indicated by the > .rec file name. I didn't bother implementing checks on --restore and --status. I think it's enough to have the check on --session. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.