Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 13:16:27 +0200 From: Agnieszka Bielec <bielecagnieszka8@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [GSoC] John the Ripper support for PHC finalists 2015-05-02 11:44 GMT+02:00 magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>: > On 2015-05-02 06:14, Agnieszka Bielec wrote: >> >> well SSE2 interleaving (I forgot to change algorithm_name to "SSE2") >> >> a@...l:~/int/run$ ./john --test --format=pomelo --cost=2:2,2:2 >> Will run 8 OpenMP threads >> Benchmarking: POMELO, Generic pomelo [AVX2]... (8xOMP) DONE > > > Just some non-critical notes: Your algorithm name should change > automatically I changed a function call from avx2 to sse2 in the code > Also, we use to say eg. [SSE2 128/128 4x] for a > format that calculates 4 hashes in parallel using SIMD, and eg. [SSE2 > 128/128 4x3] when such format is also interleaved by 3x. Please consider > using this notion since it would make your posted benchmarks much easier to > tell apart. it's 4x "internal interleaving" and 2x interleaving for both sse2 and non-simd 4x "internal interleaving" and 4x interleaving for avx2 simd exploits "internal interleaving" in my case thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.