Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 20:45:30 +0800
From: Kai Zhao <>
Subject: Re: Coding Style

> BTW I am tempted to officially have Jumbo deviate from core's tab width
> recommentdation, using 4 instead of 8. With the "indent with TABs, align
> with spaces" requirement (which I'm prepared to kill for) this only
> affects how long a line gets[*].

> Also, I think we should document that we use "tab for indent, space for
> align" as in

Do you prepare to kill the rule "tab for indent, space for align" ?

> I can relate to that and for core this is a good decision. But in Jumbo
> we live with lots of external things: Macros like
> clCreateProgramWithBinary(). Not to mention AMD's ADL. We get crazy
> long lines without writing code that should be split to more functions.
> Actually for OpenCL host code I often just give up and let it span
> several lines.

Do you think we can solve this problem by allowing to exceed column 80
in such cases while the tab-width is still 8-character?



Content of type "text/html" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.