Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 20:45:30 +0800 From: Kai Zhao <loverszhao@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Coding Style > BTW I am tempted to officially have Jumbo deviate from core's tab width > recommentdation, using 4 instead of 8. With the "indent with TABs, align > with spaces" requirement (which I'm prepared to kill for) this only > affects how long a line gets[*]. > Also, I think we should document that we use "tab for indent, space for > align" as in http://emacswiki.org/emacs/SmartTabs. Do you prepare to kill the rule "tab for indent, space for align" ? > I can relate to that and for core this is a good decision. But in Jumbo > we live with lots of external things: Macros like > CL_DEVICE_PREFERRED_VECTOR_WIDTH_CHAR and functions like > clCreateProgramWithBinary(). Not to mention AMD's ADL. We get crazy > long lines without writing code that should be split to more functions. > Actually for OpenCL host code I often just give up and let it span > several lines. Do you think we can solve this problem by allowing to exceed column 80 in such cases while the tab-width is still 8-character? Thanks, Kai Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.