Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 15:47:24 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Problem with john.conf On 04/04/2015 01:39 PM, magnum wrote: > http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-users/2015/04/04/1 should be refered > to as well. > > A name of "?List" is not an error, it's just not parsed as a list. Solar > pointed out an inconsistency we have with .include sections now. Maybe > the problem is that #1121 made John silently ignore a situation instead > of bailing out with an error? Yes, I think a section named "[List.*]" should only be able to include other sections named "[List.*]", and Sections using other names shouldn't be allowed to include "[List.*]" sections. I wouldn't require sections included by a "[List.Rules:*]" section to be named "[List.Rules:*]". Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.