Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:19:36 +0300
From: Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: 256/128 bit integer arithmatic

Hi Sayantan,

I'm sorry I didn't comment sooner.

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 06:40:23PM +0530, Sayantan Datta wrote:
> Also using  less than 128 bits precision of hashes would mean various
> hashes would map to same location,

And that's fine.

> which is against the purpose of building such tables.

Not quite.  In fact, I think it's usually pointless to send bigger than
64-bit partial hashes to GPU.  We certainly can deal with the rare false
positives on the host.

So perfect hash tables based on 64-bit or smaller partial hashes make
sense to me, _if_ perfect hashes are the right thing to pursue at all.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.