Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:47:38 -0400 From: Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: qhasm-cudasm (was: Xeon Phi) On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > Thanks, although I would have appreciated you posting this to a separate > thread as it has little to do with Xeon Phi. Sorry about that, I know better. > On the actual topic, I think you're confused. In > http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-dev/2012/11/02/2 you had already > corrected your own confusion - > > "My mistake, that was not qhasm-cudasm. Sorry." > > Our "Low-level GPU programming" idea says "the qhasm-cudasm tool is not > released", and as far as I'm aware this is still correct. It goes to show I'm still confused :) -rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.