Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:50:36 +0530 From: Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com> To: john-dev <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Redesign Self-test for implementing compare on device. On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:35 AM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: > Solar, > > On 2015-01-18 15:28, Sayantan Datta wrote: > > First, when salt is NULL, why does the return value of crypt_all() has > > match *count the way it is after crypt_all() call ? Can't we remove this > > restriction ? Here's the previously discussed idea on this issue: > > > https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/1030#issuecomment-70404396 > > Perhaps that wording in formats.h is merely reflecting the current > self-test's requirement? I can't see any reason why we couldn't lift > that restriction. Can you? I asked Sayantan to bring this up on the ML > to avoid us making decisions you would later reject or dislike. > > magnum > > Here's is a patch of the reworked self-test. It is backwards compatible and takes into account the newer issues. Regards, Sayantan Content of type "text/html" skipped View attachment "self-test.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2531 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.