Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 06:40:29 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: PRINCE On 2015-01-09 17:16, Solar Designer wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 05:02:02PM +0100, magnum wrote: >> I saw a couple of bugfixes a day so far, so it's not completely stable. >> We should try to keep it "mergable" in one way or the other. At least >> refrain from large rewrites unless necessary. For example, we should >> #ifdef out unneeded code blocks instead of dropping them. > > Right, or alternatively we reimplement and then maintain our own code, > and submit it back to hashcat project. Maybe later. ;-) I think the > dependency on GMP could/should be avoided, e.g. in favor of "double" > (like our charset.c uses it) or in favor of saturation at 2^64-1. Yes, later. We actually have a rough version committed now. It's Atom's code used almost as-is, with the output prints replaced with crk_process_key(). It does not yet support resume, node/fork or ETA/progress but I will fix this in the nearest couple of days. Performance is only half as good as I expected from something Atom wrote. Maybe there's some really low hanging fruit, I haven't got to that yet. My #1 prio is session save/restore, #2 is node/fork. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.