[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141212111357.GA26896@openwall.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:13:57 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Crack 5.0's RULE_RESTART '*'
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:33:04AM +0100, magnum wrote:
> Hashcat also has +N and -N which I implemented but never committed
> (http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-users/2013/09/22/10) because they
> clash with Single mode concat, and rule reject.
Oh. The clash with rule rejects is a non-issue - just prefix the line
with ':' (not your suggested 'M', which actually costs at runtime).
It's similar to '[' being both a rule and a preprocessor command.
However, the clash of '+' with Single mode word concatenation is
unfortunate. It'd be nasty to introduce any magic processing of '+'.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
