Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 00:05:37 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: proof of concept converter of rexgen-like syntax into john rules On 2014-04-17 23:58, magnum wrote: > On 2014-04-15 21:26, Rich Rumble wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:11 PM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: >> >>> One side effect when working with this is it makes me want a sed2rules >>> generator too, perhaps even in combination with rexgen ;-) This would >>> finally solve the "complex leet permutations" problem (like "replace >>> any of >>> [aA] with any of [aA4@] *and* any of [eE] with any of [eE3] *and* any of >>> ..."). >>> >> Just a quick note, I have great success with "1337" rules that don't >> replace ALL instances... But I get what you were saying :) >> http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-users/2010/08/03/4 > > I bet that's very common. Doing what I describe above, we will create > all combinations of "only some instances" as well as "all instances". > But it would result in a large number of rules I guess. On second thought that won't happen they way I described it. This is a complex issue! magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.