Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:33:04 +0100 From: Katja Malvoni <kmalvoni@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: bcrypt-parallella on 64-core (was: Katja's weekly report #13) On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Katja Malvoni <kmalvoni@...il.com> wrote: > With the same code, performance on E16 system is 1194 c/s because I'm > transferring whole inputs structure no matter whether keys or salt changed. > If I transfer keys only when changed, performance on E16 is 1207 c/s and on E64 it's 4812 c/s. And code seems to be reliable. I left "while :; do rm -f john.log john.pot; seq 0 49999 | sudo -E LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH ./john -stdin -form=bcrypt-parallella ~/pw-bcrypt-2salt-50k 2>&1 > /dev/null | fgrep 0:00; done" running for half an hour, it cracked all hashes on both E16 and E64 system. Katja Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.