Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:48:34 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: ZedBoard: bcrypt On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Katja Malvoni wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:21:10PM +0100, Katja Malvoni wrote: > > > Register: 5% > > > LUT: 41% > > > Slice: 66% > > > RAMB36E1: 6% > > > RAMB18E1: 1% > > > BUFG: 3% > > > With these numbers there is no point in trying to find bug(s). > > > I'll try to redesign current implementation. > > > > Are these numbers for one core (two instances of bcrypt)? Ouch. > > Yes, that is correct. I tried to reduce initialization code but it didn't > help much - LUT: 39%, Slice: 63% Can you identify what most LUTs are used for? In fact, can you answer the same question also for your older one-instance-per-core code? Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.