Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:43:57 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: descrypt-opencl "section 0" fix Sayantan, magnum - On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:16:09PM +0530, Sayantan Datta wrote: > On 10/30/13, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: > > These changes in 0c2259b as well as other changes in 1c5e1e5 has not > > been merged to the bleeding-mask branch because of conflicts. You get to > > do that. BTW I'm really growing tired of maintaining bleeding-mask, > > nothing seems to happen there anyway? > > I didn't had much free time lately, so there wasn't much progress in > the bleeding-mask branch, As you mentioned earlier CPU mask mode is > slower than incremental mode, I'll work on that. Also what are our > expectations with bleeding-mask ? Do we want to release it as jumbo > someday ? I don't currently have expectations regarding bleeding-mask. I need to find time to release bleeding-jumbo as a new jumbo first, and only then to look at bleeding-mask more closely. Depending on what shape I find it in, yes, it might become a new jumbo release someday (and then it'll be the base for further jumbo development). Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.