[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:39:13 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: descrypt-opencl "section 0" fix
On 2013-10-29 18:16, magnum wrote:
> On 2013-10-29 15:23, Solar Designer wrote:
>> descrypt-opencl was failing to crack some of the hashes the correct
>> candidate passwords for which appeared in indices 0 to 31.
>
>> The attached patch attempts to and appears to correct this. At least my
>> tests pass now. Note that while I am patching both instances of the
>> code, I think I have tested only one of them.
>
> Committed. I'll investigate if we can enhance the Test Suite in some way.
Sayantan,
These changes in 0c2259b as well as other changes in 1c5e1e5 has not
been merged to the bleeding-mask branch because of conflicts. You get to
do that. BTW I'm really growing tired of maintaining bleeding-mask,
nothing seems to happen there anyway?
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
