Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 20:05:12 +0530 From: Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: MIT-licensed files On 10/01/13 at 03:18pm, Solar Designer wrote: > Besides the (now changed) 7z format, there are a few more source files > with MIT license. I think most of those should be changed to use our > standard cut-down BSD license wording instead. Only those files where > we're using code from third-party authors (not direct contributors to > JtR) should retain their original licenses (so if they were under MIT > license, it makes sense to keep our changes under MIT license too). > > Here are the files: > > src/agilekeychain_fmt_plug.c > src/opencl_agilekeychain_fmt.c > > src/lastpass_sniffed_fmt_plug.c > > src/opencl_blockchain_fmt.c > > src/blockchain_fmt_plug.c > > src/cloudkeychain_fmt_plug.c > > run/1password2john.py > > run/office2john.py (I have lazily snipped too many lines) The licensing problems in these files should be fixed now. I have committed my fixes to the "bleeding-jumbo" branch. Do my changes look OK? -- Dhiru
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.