Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:02:55 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: ZedBoard / Parallella: bcrypt Katja, On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 08:33:45PM +0200, Katja Malvoni wrote: > At one moment I hard coded cost to be 5 and I forgot about it so it works > only for cost 5 hashes. I'm testing it with cost 12 and I'm getting cracks > so it works now. Oh, this must be why my test had failed - I was using $2a$04 hashes there. I should have noticed that the c/s rate reported on the status line matched the self-test's (it did), which means it was for $2a$05. > At the moment it's on around 390000 clock cycles with dual port ram > (simulation works, not tested on Zedboard). 390000 clock cycles for $2a$05? This feels too fast. Maybe you meant 3900000 (twice faster than you had before)? Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.