Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 18:29:37 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: crk_timestamps On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:18:45PM +0200, magnum wrote: > So basically we revert to the original allocation of crk_timestamps, and then we skip the dupe check in crk_process_key() [setting dupe=0] whenever index > max_keys_per_crypt and that's it, right? Right, except that you meant ">=" and crk_process_guess(). Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.