Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:35:23 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Parallella: Litecoin mining Rafael, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:50:15PM +0100, Rafael Waldo Delgado Doblas wrote: > 2013/8/21 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> > > > you're both adding new file epiphany-scrypt.c and making changes to the > > existing file scrypt.c. Perhaps changes to the latter should now be > > reverted? They're very minor: removing the static qualifier from > > scrypt_1024_1_1_256_sp(), and some whitespace edits. The former looks > > like a (minor) bug to me. > > I'm using the function scrypt_1024_1_1_256_sp() to check if the epiphany > code works fine, then I need to keep this change at least up to I have a > stable version. OK. Where/how are you invoking that function for testing, though? Is there a way I can easily run the same test? Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.