[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:35:23 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Parallella: Litecoin mining
Rafael,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:50:15PM +0100, Rafael Waldo Delgado Doblas wrote:
> 2013/8/21 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
>
> > you're both adding new file epiphany-scrypt.c and making changes to the
> > existing file scrypt.c. Perhaps changes to the latter should now be
> > reverted? They're very minor: removing the static qualifier from
> > scrypt_1024_1_1_256_sp(), and some whitespace edits. The former looks
> > like a (minor) bug to me.
>
> I'm using the function scrypt_1024_1_1_256_sp() to check if the epiphany
> code works fine, then I need to keep this change at least up to I have a
> stable version.
OK.
Where/how are you invoking that function for testing, though? Is there
a way I can easily run the same test?
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
