Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:41:22 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 On 23 Jul, 2013, at 3:59 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: > On 22 Jul, 2013, at 21:53 , Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> wrote: >> On 07/22/13 at 08:36pm, Lukas Odzioba wrote: >>> 2013/7/16 Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com>: >>>> Benchmarking: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256, rounds=12000 [PBKDF2-SHA256]... (4xOMP) DONE >>>> Raw: 704 c/s real, 176 c/s virtual >>> >>> Attached OpenCL version. >> >> Committed "pbkdf2-hmac-sha256-opencl.diff" to bleeding-jumbo. >> >> There is *no* need to use the "any_cracked" approach in this format. Let >> us try not to repeat my past "sins" ;) > > Right. This is better, although it doesn't affect speed for a slow format like this As I had the code edited and tested, I committed it now just for good measure. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.