Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 22:34:34 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Probably a third BUG in pbkdf2_hmac_sha1_unsplit_kernel.cl On 12 Jul, 2013, at 19:31 , marcus.desto <marcus.desto@...pl> wrote: > looks like there is one more bug: > > If #define SALTLEN 51 for SALTLEN is set to other value NOT 51 in pbkdf2_hmac_sha1_unsplit_kernel.cl, then > resulting hashes are zero (16 or 20 - depends on parameters - zeros). > > Someone may varify it using c/c++. Are you sure you got all defines right now? We have lots of formats working fine with a salt length much less than 51. Please post an example python file that demonstrates the problem as simply as possible. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.