Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 01:05:59 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: popular binary_hash_* On 11 Jun, 2013, at 21:51 , Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com> wrote: > 2013/6/10 magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>: >> This is coalesced and out of order so shared functions can't be used. >> >> These have some sort of GPU-side comparison. > > Sure, just wanted to let you know :) > >>> Some of the formats had debug info inside binary_hash_0 function, I >>> left them as is. >> >> We might want to add debug code to the shared functions instead. > > Somehow I am not convinced to this idea. > > Attached patch for the rest, thanks for help with this, > Lukas > <common_binary_hash_N_final.diff> Your changes to DES, BSDI and LM broke them for some builds. I just reverted those. Be very careful when changing core files! magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.