Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:56:44 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: new dev box wishes (was: Contest) On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:48:58PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > Here's a question: do we want the Titan at stock clocks or one of those > vendor-overclocked models (can be up to 10% faster)? In other words, do > we want our benchmark results to represent stock Titan, or do we want > better speeds (and we'd have to mention the weird clock rates each time > we publish benchmarks obtained on our Titan)? Unfortunately, I am not > aware of an existing tool to adjust clock rates on NVIDIA cards from > Linux (such tools exist for Windows), so we'd be stuck at vendor's. Specifically: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/graphics/display/zotac-geforce-gtx-titan-amp-edition-6gb-sli.html#sect0 Stock clocks: 837 MHz base, 876 MHz boost, 6008 MHz memory Vendor o/c: 902 MHz base, 954 MHz boost, 6608 MHz memory For comparison, GTX 780 stock clocks: 863 MHz base, 900 MHz boost, 6008 MHz memory So stock Titan has lower clocks than stock GTX 780, but vendor o/c Titan has higher clocks than stock GTX 780. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.