Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 14:43:33 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Dyna renames (question) On 9 Jun, 2013, at 14:39 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: > On 9 Jun, 2013, at 14:31 , <jfoug@....net> wrote: >> ---- magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: >>> Solar moved the cracking algo into algorithm_name too, eg. [MD5 128/128 SSE2]. For dynamic, an option would be using the full algo spec for that, like this: >>> Benchmarking: dynamic_1: (joomla) [md5($p.$s) 128/128 SSE2]. >> >> I like this, however, we also must address the -list=subformats, along with the benchmark screen output. I will start toying around with this, and see what comes of it. Lets NOT modify the bench-unify immediately, since the first round may not be the final. > > I just committed a change that just dropped the word "intrinsics" from all algorithm names (dynamic was affected through the use of shared headers). This change does not affect benchmark-unify though. I will refrain from further such changes while you work on it. I might address specific non-dynamic formats though. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.