Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 11:57:31 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Dyna renames (question) On 6 Jun, 2013, at 23:29 , jfoug <jfoug@....net> wrote: > If I made this change to dynamic naming. > > current: > Benchmarking: dynamic_1, dynamic_1: md5($p.$s) (joomla) [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 10x4x3]. > > change to: > Benchmarking: dynamic_1: md5($p.$s) (joomla) [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 10x4x3]. > > or even: > Benchmarking: dynamic_1: md5($p.$s) (joomla) [SSE2 10x4x3]. > > What type side effects would we be dealing with? and what would require changing? I assume benchmark_unify, possibly the *completion scripts. I think benchmark-unify is the only thing that would need to adopt. The shell completion stuff only deals with format_label and that doesn't change. > If I were to make these changes, what actual changes would be wanted? Solar moved the cracking algo into algorithm_name too, eg. [MD5 128/128 SSE2]. For dynamic, an option would be using the full algo spec for that, like this: Benchmarking: dynamic_1: (joomla) [md5($p.$s) 128/128 SSE2]. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.