Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 11:57:31 +0200
From: magnum <>
Subject: Re: Dyna renames (question)

On 6 Jun, 2013, at 23:29 , jfoug <> wrote:
> If I made this change to dynamic naming.
> current:
> Benchmarking: dynamic_1, dynamic_1: md5($p.$s) (joomla) [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 10x4x3].
> change to:
> Benchmarking: dynamic_1: md5($p.$s) (joomla) [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 10x4x3].
> or even:
> Benchmarking: dynamic_1: md5($p.$s) (joomla) [SSE2 10x4x3].
> What type side effects would we be dealing with?  and what would require changing? I assume benchmark_unify, possibly the *completion scripts.

I think benchmark-unify is the only thing that would need to adopt. The shell completion stuff only deals with format_label and that doesn't change.

> If I were to make these changes, what actual changes would be wanted?

Solar moved the cracking algo into algorithm_name too, eg. [MD5 128/128 SSE2]. For dynamic, an option would be using the full algo spec for that, like this:
Benchmarking: dynamic_1: (joomla) [md5($p.$s) 128/128 SSE2].


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.